Three Builders, Three Pieces

Three people are each building a different slice of the same problem, none of them a duplicate of another. Eric (Avoca) owns quality and go-live readiness: responder-based test suites grouped by concern, with a V2 that stores each suite as a database template and generates test cases dynamically from knowledge-base data instead of hard-coding them, executed on Hamming underneath and kept deliberately one-click for CS and TAM users. Caleb (Lazer) owns configuration: a compare-and-replay script that pulls recent real calls, replays the customer side against both the legacy and the new assistant, matches responses and tool calls, and scores whether you can switch confidently, plus an LLM configuration audit driven by a new "client expectations" field that grades a prompt and its config against what the client actually asked for. Matt (Lazer) owns regression, specifically before you hit save: a lightweight LLM replay using real calls as baselines, answering "did I just break existing functionality?" The convergence worth naming is Eric's: Caleb's versioning question and Matt's regression question are the same engine pointed at two different pairs, so they should merge into one behavioral-diff capability with two trigger points.